
- GENIUS Act blocks Big Tech from stablecoin control.
- Circle and Tether lead favorable responses.
- Market likely to favor regulated stablecoin issuers.

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire, alongside Tether’s Paolo Ardoino, applauded the GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump, which blocks Big Tech from controlling stablecoins, positioning Circle to benefit from increased regulatory clarity.
The GENIUS Act prevents Big Tech from dominating the stablecoin market, affecting competitors like Meta. This boosts regulated issuers’ credibility and market presence, reshaping the industry landscape favorably for crypto-native firms.
The Impact of the GENIUS Act on Big Tech and Stablecoin Issuers
The GENIUS Act, enacted by the U.S., limits non-financial firms with revenues above $25 billion from stablecoin activities. Jeremy Allaire highlighted its alignment with Circle’s operational standards, promoting trust from institutions and regulatory bodies. As Allaire noted,
“The legislation aligns with Circle’s operational practices, which have earned trust from leading institutions due to its commitment to transparent audits and adherence to global regulatory standards.”
Paolo Ardoino’s presence at the signing underscores industry unity. Circle expects enhanced reputation and potential institutional funding increases due to greater compliance guarantees. By excluding Big Tech, the stablecoin market gains in diversity, allowing established crypto companies like Circle to strengthen their market share.
Analyst Predictions and Market Reactions
Industry analysts suggest financial systems favor transparent and compliant stablecoins, predicting that liquidity will favor regulated issuers. This shift could make platforms reliant on stablecoins such as USDC more appealing compared to those less regulated.
Expect increased scrutiny on stablecoin issuers, emphasizing regulatory alignment. Market compliance may lead to broader adoption, while projects once exploring Big Tech collaborations face new challenges. Historical attempts by Meta signal persistent regulatory concerns over market dominance. Regulatory strategies now favor native crypto issuers over tech conglomerates.
Be the first to leave a comment