
- The high-profile investor fell victim to impersonation.
- Investigated by ZachXBT, leading blockchain analyst.
- Assets laundered through Wasabi Wallet for privacy.

A Bitcoin investor lost 783 BTC (~$91.4 million) in a scam on August 19, 2025. Attackers impersonated support staff from a hardware wallet and crypto exchange; funds were routed through Wasabi Wallet for obfuscation.
A Bitcoin investor lost 783 BTC (~$91.4 million) in a social engineering scam on August 19, 2025, with attackers posing as support staff.
The incident highlights the ongoing risk of social engineering scams in the cryptocurrency space, with potential implications for investor security and trust.
Scam Details and Investigation
A prominent Bitcoin investor lost 783 BTC valued at $91.4 million on August 19. Attackers deceived the victim by impersonating support staff, a strategy seen in recent years. The incident was revealed by blockchain analyst ZachXBT.
“This latest incident involving the theft of 783 BTC showcases how scam tactics are evolving, particularly through social engineering.”Source
The involved perpetrators remain unidentified, with authorities seeking leads. The funds were obscured using Wasabi Wallet, a tool known for enhancing transaction privacy. This tactic aligns with previous high-scale crypto theft methodologies.
Impact and Broader Implications
The impact of the theft is markedly individual, with no broader market ramifications reported. Bitcoin remains the sole affected asset, with no Ethereum or alternative coins exploited. Broader institutional responses are presently minimal.
Historically, such scams have grown, highlighted by the $243 million 2024 theft. Social engineering remains a potent threat to individual crypto holders, stressing the need for enhanced security measures against imposter schemes.
The tech and regulatory landscape may push for stronger authentication methods. Blockchain analysts continue to explore secure protocols, but robust defenses are critical. The escalating frequency underscores vulnerabilities needing further cyber resilience development.
Be the first to leave a comment