
- Coinbase legal director disputes FDIC’s document release on crypto debanking.
- Regulatory tension over bank-crypto firm partnerships.
- Debanking impacts digital asset market access.

Coinbase’s legal director accuses the FDIC of stalling efforts to make public documents on crypto debanking. Over 180 documents reveal regulatory resistance to banks working with crypto firms, hindering industry growth and diminishing access to banking services.
The conflict impacts crypto firm access to banking services, influencing market liquidity and regulatory dynamics.
Coinbase’s Allegations
Coinbase has accused the FDIC of continually obstructing the release of documents related to crypto firm debanking. The allegation follows multiple FOIA lawsuits filed by Coinbase. Key figures like Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s Chief Legal Officer, have actively pursued legal actions against the FDIC. He stated, “We can’t and won’t stand for it,” highlighting Coinbase’s frustration.
FDIC’s Restrictive Approach
FDIC’s restrictive approach has led many banks to avoid partnerships with crypto companies, affecting market growth. Key cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH face limited banking access. Travis Hill, FDIC Acting Chairman, acknowledged past regulatory resistance stating, “[banks’] requests to engage in crypto-related activities were almost universally met with resistance…These and other actions [by the FDIC] sent the message to banks that it would be extraordinarily difficult—if not impossible—to move forward.”
Impact of Debanking on Cryptocurrency Markets
Previous debanking actions have historically hindered the growth of cryptocurrency markets, as seen with Operation Choke Point. Current policies risk repeating such economic restraint. The limitation on banking access for crypto firms could affect liquidity across DeFi protocols. Historical precedents and emerging data suggest potential market shifts if regulations adapt.
Be the first to leave a comment