Background

Half of PancakeSwap Contest Winners Connected, Claims Whistleblower

Article arrow_drop_down
Half of PancakeSwap Contest Winners Connected, Claims Whistleblower
Key Points:
  • Collusion and non-randomness in PancakeSwap competition winners.
  • Half of the winners had linked wallets.
  • No response from PancakeSwap on these allegations.
half-of-pancakeswap-contest-winners-connected-claims-whistleblower
Half of PancakeSwap Contest Winners Connected, Claims Whistleblower

Half of PancakeSwapโ€™s โ€˜randomโ€™ winners are reportedly interconnected wallets, raising concerns about prize fairness. On-chain analysis by League of Traders found 850 out of 1,700 winning wallets exhibited suspicious clustering and BNB trading patterns.

In a PancakeSwap trading competition on the BNB Chain, allegations have arisen regarding collusion among winners. The competition ended with several winnersโ€™ wallets allegedly interconnected, raising questions about the drawโ€™s purported randomness.

Concerns over PancakeSwapโ€™s competition highlight potential integrity issues in decentralized trading, with implications for market trust and potential regulatory scrutiny.

The PancakeSwap competition, involving five Binance Alpha projects, awarded $250,000 in prizes. Questions arose when 850 out of 1,700 winning wallets were found interconnected. These findings, based on on-chain analysis, suggest possible collusion among winners. The PancakeSwap core team remains silent, issuing no public comments about the winner irregularities.

The linked wallets connected through every sponsored token, including League of Traders, Bedrock DAO, and others. League of Traders stated, โ€œThe wallets were directly connected,โ€ pointing to a lack of randomness.

โ€œThe wallets were directly connected to each other, and they were getting picked. The chance of that happening consecutively is close to zero.โ€ โ€“ League of Traders Representative

Financial implications are under scrutiny as PancakeSwap remains unresponsive amid these winner clustering allegations.

The dispute raises concerns about decentralized platformsโ€™ oversight and technological vulnerabilities. Potential regulatory and market impacts loom, as investor trust is questioned due to the alleged manipulated outcomes. Despite this, PancakeSwap has made no public comment on addressing Sybil attacks or anti-collusion mechanisms in its ecosystem. As investigations continue, the incident underscores ongoing challenges within the DeFi space related to governance and competition integrity.

About the author

Related

About Coinlineup

CoinLineup is a specialized platform dedicated to empowering investors with the knowledge and tools needed to succeed in both the financial stock market and the crypto market. Our primary focus is to provide comprehensive market insights by delivering real-time and historical data, solid investment strategies, and trading tips. We aim to equip investors with accurate information, allowing them to make well-informed decisions in their financial endeavors.

Copyright 2024 coinlineup.com. Crypto, Stocks, and Forex โ€“ All in One Place.

Login to enjoy full advantages

Please login or subscribe to continue.

โœ–

Go Premium!

Enjoy the full advantage of the premium access.

Login

โœ–

Stop following

Unfollow Cancel

โœ–

Cancel subscription

Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.

Go back Confirm cancellation

โœ–