
- HTX withdraws 570M USDT, impacting Aave’s rates and liquidity.
- USDT liquidity on Aave drops sharply to $91.95 million.
- Significant interest rate jumps for Aave’s USDT borrowers and lenders.

HTX, a major crypto exchange linked to Justin Sun, withdrew 570 million USDT from Aave within the last three hours, causing interest rates to soar.
HTX’s large-scale USDT withdrawal significantly disrupts Aave‘s lending pool, prompting a rapid rise in interest rates and creating volatile market conditions.
Bold liquidity actions have transformed Aave’s lending environment.
Notably, the withdrawal of 570 million USDT by HTX caused the USDT deposit rate to surge from 3.8% to 29%. This is a major liquidity contraction event.
The entity involved, HTX, is often linked to crypto leader Justin Sun. Reported by blockchain monitoring accounts like @EmberCN on Twitter, but without formal statements, this withdrawal demonstrates impactful financial maneuvers in the cryptocurrency realm.
The withdrawal’s immediate aftermath includes a drastic liquidity decline, pushing borrowing and lending costs upward. This heightens risks and market volatility for DeFi users on Aave, with potential cascading effects on interconnected DeFi platforms.
“HTX’s address withdrew 570 million USDT from Aave within the last three hours, causing Aave’s available USDT liquidity to drop sharply to $91.95 million. This liquidity crunch has triggered a rapid spike in Aave’s USDT deposit rate from 3.8% to 29%…” source
While broad market indicators like BTC and ETH remain stable, USDT’s involvement signals a particular sensitivity to such large liquidity shifts, often prompting historical rate volatility and arbitrage opportunities.
Historical precedents show that HTX’s large transfers can spur short-term rate surges. Market participants might expect parallel reactions and possible solutions like enhancing liquidity conditions. Such actions typically aim to stabilize and normalize interest rates on DeFi protocols.
Aave’s governance models could be influenced by such liquidity events. Users and stakeholders might engage in discussions for policy amendments or risk mitigation strategies to secure more stable liquidity flows, reducing future financial shocks.
Be the first to leave a comment