- HTX withdraws 570M USDT, impacting Aaveโs rates and liquidity.
- USDT liquidity on Aave drops sharply to $91.95 million.
- Significant interest rate jumps for Aaveโs USDT borrowers and lenders.

HTX, a major crypto exchange linked to Justin Sun, withdrew 570 million USDT from Aave within the last three hours, causing interest rates to soar.
HTXโs large-scale USDT withdrawal significantly disrupts Aaveโs lending pool, prompting a rapid rise in interest rates and creating volatile market conditions.
Bold liquidity actions have transformed Aaveโs lending environment.
Notably, the withdrawal of 570 million USDT by HTX caused the USDT deposit rate to surge from 3.8% to 29%. This is a major liquidity contraction event.
The entity involved, HTX, is often linked to crypto leader Justin Sun. Reported by blockchain monitoring accounts like @EmberCN on Twitter, but without formal statements, this withdrawal demonstrates impactful financial maneuvers in the cryptocurrency realm.
The withdrawalโs immediate aftermath includes a drastic liquidity decline, pushing borrowing and lending costs upward. This heightens risks and market volatility for DeFi users on Aave, with potential cascading effects on interconnected DeFi platforms.
โHTXโs address withdrew 570 million USDT from Aave within the last three hours, causing Aaveโs available USDT liquidity to drop sharply to $91.95 million. This liquidity crunch has triggered a rapid spike in Aaveโs USDT deposit rate from 3.8% to 29%โฆโ source
While broad market indicators like BTC and ETH remain stable, USDTโs involvement signals a particular sensitivity to such large liquidity shifts, often prompting historical rate volatility and arbitrage opportunities.
Historical precedents show that HTXโs large transfers can spur short-term rate surges. Market participants might expect parallel reactions and possible solutions like enhancing liquidity conditions. Such actions typically aim to stabilize and normalize interest rates on DeFi protocols.
Aaveโs governance models could be influenced by such liquidity events. Users and stakeholders might engage in discussions for policy amendments or risk mitigation strategies to secure more stable liquidity flows, reducing future financial shocks.