- Qubicโs takeover attempt centralizes Moneroโs hashrate, sparking opposition.
- Sergey Ivancheglo leads Qubicโs controversial move.
- Monero community takes actions to decentralize mining efforts.
Monero is currently experiencing an attempted network takeover by Qubic mining pool, led by Sergey Ivancheglo. This has centralized the hashrate, prompting Monero developers to act and significantly reduce Qubicโs mining dominance.
Hashrate centralization of Monero raises concerns about network security and economic attacks. It highlights vulnerabilities in decentralized frameworks.
The takeover attempt, led by Sergey Ivancheglo, threatens decentralized mining efforts and has prompted community backlash. Qubic controlled a large share of Moneroโs hashrate until the plan was exposed. Sergey Ivancheglo, a known blockchain figure, founded Qubic and previously co-founded IOTA. Dan Dadybayo of Unstoppable Wallet has publicly analyzed these risks. Despite a substantial decrease in Qubicโs mining share, concerns remain over network security.
The attempted takeover has prompted a significant redistribution of Moneroโs hashrate within mining pools after community efforts to regain decentralization. Financially, Qubicโs plan redirected XMR mining rewards into its ecosystem, affecting Moneroโs economic structure.
โWith 51% of the hashrate, Qubic can orphan blocks, reject transactions, delay confirmations, stifle competition, and force protocol changesโฆ intent doesnโt matter. Centralization means risk, and potential censorship is destructive to the network.โ โ Dan Dadybayo, Analyst, Unstoppable Wallet
No direct statements have been issued by regulatory authorities such as the SEC or CFTC regarding this incident. However, the Monero development community is monitoring the situation closely for any future mitigation measures.
Looking forward, this incident may lead to increased scrutiny of centralization risks in cryptocurrency mining. Potential outcomes include strengthened decentralization mechanisms and protocol adjustments to prevent similar future incidents. Historically, the risk of large-scale mining pool centralization has prompted significant debate and action within the cryptocurrency industry.
