CoW DAO has approved a compensation program for victims of the cow.fi domain hijacking incident, with affected users required to submit claims by May 14.
What CoW DAO approved for cow.fi hijack victims
The decentralized autonomous organization behind CoW Protocol passed CIP-86, a discretionary grants program designed to compensate users who lost funds when the cow.fi frontend was compromised. The proposal specifically targets victims of the domain hijacking, not broader protocol issues.
According to reporting from Phemex, the DAO approved approximately $1.2 million in voluntary refunds for phishing attack victims. The compensation is structured as discretionary grants rather than guaranteed reimbursements.
The approval followed a governance vote conducted through the DAO’s standard proposal process. Domain hijacking attacks redirect users to fraudulent versions of legitimate websites, allowing attackers to drain wallets through malicious transaction approvals.
Why the May 14 claims deadline matters
Affected users have until May 14 to file their claims under the approved program. That deadline is now just days away, making this a time-sensitive action item for anyone who interacted with the compromised cow.fi domain and suffered losses.
Users who believe they were affected should review the full CIP-86 proposal on the CoW Forum for specific eligibility criteria and submission instructions. Missing the deadline could mean forfeiting any claim to compensation under this program.
DAO governance as an accountability mechanism
The decision highlights how DAO governance structures can serve as a mechanism for user protection after security incidents. Rather than relying on a centralized company to decide compensation terms, CoW DAO put the matter to a community vote.
This approach contrasts with how centralized platforms handle similar breaches. In the broader crypto ecosystem, institutions like Strategy, which recently expanded its Bitcoin holdings to 818,869 BTC, operate under traditional corporate governance, while DAOs must build consensus among token holders for every major decision.
The compensation vote also reflects a growing expectation among DeFi users that protocols bear some responsibility for frontend security, even when the underlying smart contracts remain uncompromised. As capital continues flowing into crypto infrastructure projects, the question of who pays when a domain is hijacked remains largely unresolved across the industry.
For CoW DAO, the approved grants program sets a precedent: the community chose to make affected users partially whole through voluntary action. As traditional financial institutions expand their crypto custody services, the gap between centralized accountability frameworks and DAO-driven responses will continue to shape how the industry handles security failures.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
